Khamis, 10 Mac 2011

BLOG - BLOG PARTI PKR

BLOG - BLOG PARTI PKR


MEDIA Rakyat MALAYSIA

Posted: 10 Mar 2011 03:35 AM PST

MEDIA Rakyat MALAYSIA


Ada cerite Anwar dalam buku Mahader, doktor kat rumah ni...

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 06:29 PM PST

KEDAH online

Posted: 10 Mar 2011 03:13 AM PST

KEDAH online


HARGA MINYAK AKAN NAIK DALAM MASA TERDEKAT?

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 05:19 PM PST

Angkatan Muda Parti Keadilan Rakyat Cabang Bukit Gantang, Perak

Posted: 10 Mar 2011 01:13 AM PST

Angkatan Muda Parti Keadilan Rakyat Cabang Bukit Gantang, Perak


Ceramah Penerangan

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 09:09 PM PST

The Spirit of Lubok Kawah/Semangat Lubok Kawah

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 11:22 PM PST

The Spirit of Lubok Kawah/Semangat Lubok Kawah


Sumbangan bantuan kepada mangsa-mangsa banjir di Matau, Bandar Jengka

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 09:55 PM PST

Sdr Mat Yee, Ketua Ranting PKR Matau sedang membacakan senarai mangsa-mangsa banjir di Matau akibat hujan lebat beberapa jam di kawasan DUN Jengka, DUN Pulau Tawar dan DUN Jenderak pada 8hb Mac 2011, rumah-rumah mereka ditenggelami air.
Diantara 47 orang mangsa banjir di Matau
Align Center
Align Center
Mangsa banjir di Matau

==

Dato Fauzi Abdul Rahman, Pengerusi Majlis Pimpinan PKR Negeri Pahang telah berkunjung ke perkampongan Matau di Bandar Jengka Pahang untuk meninjau sendiri kerosakan dan kemusnahan akibat banjir yang melanda perkampongan Matau setelah hujan turun tidak henti-henti pada 8hb Mac 2011.

Matau adalah sebuah perkampongan asal penempatan penduduk-penduduk Bandar Jengka semasa Jengka mula-mula diterokai hampir lebih 40 tahun lampau.

Perkampongan yang menempakan lebih dari 200 penghuni ini telah menjadi rebutan golongan korporat untuk mendapatkannya untuk dijadikan kawasan perumahan dan kedai memandangkan kawasan ini menjadi pintu masuk ke Bandar Pusat Jengka.

Penduduk di perkampongan itu telah menubuhkan Jawatankuasa Penduduk untuk memohon geran tanah dan telah menyampaikan memorandum kepada Kebawah Duli Yang Maha Mulia Sultan Pahang dan kepada Kerajaan Negeri Pahang agar penduduk-penduduk Matau dapat diberikan geran tanah.

Usaha daripada pihak ahli-ahli UMNO disini untuk mendapatkan geran bagi penduduk-penduduk telah menemui jalan buntu dan gagal, tetapi perjuangan untuk mendapatkan geran tanah disini kini dipelopori oleh Jawatankuasa Penduduk yang terdiri daripada penyokong-penyokong UMNO, PKR dan PAS. Parti Keadilan Rakyat mempunyai hampir 140 orang anggota di perkampongan Matau ini.

Bantuan yang disampaikan kepada 47 orang keluarga yang ditimpa musibah banjir ini adalah didalam bentuk wang tunai dan barang-barang makanan.

Bantuan seterusnya akan disampaikan oleh penyumbang-penyumbang daripada Negeri Selangor dan tarikh penyerahan bantuan-bantuan itu akan ditetapkan oleh pihak-pihak penyumbang.

AMK KEDAH

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 09:04 PM PST

AMK KEDAH


Anwar luang masa minum kopi bersama rakyat marhaen

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 10:54 AM PST


Tidak seperti pimpinan Umno Barisan Nasional (BN) yang lebih gemar mengekalkan sifat kebangsawanan mereka, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim sebaliknya selesa bertemu rakyat marhaen.

Malah, beliau walaupun sibuk dengan perbicaraan kes Fitnah II dan peranannya selaku Ketua Umum KEADILAN dan Ketua Pembangkang, sempat meluangkan masa menghirup kopi di gerai tepi jalan.

Sebagai seorang pemimpin berjiwa rakyat, minum kopi sambil beramah mesra dengan rakyat bukan sesuatu yang asing buat Anwar.

Hal ini terbukti apabila beliau bersama penduduk Kampung Belah Dua tanpa mengira kaum mahupun usia ketika mengadakan lawatan ke Pulau Pinang baru-baru ini

Anwar Ibrahim

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 07:54 PM PST

Anwar Ibrahim


Dr M A ‘Blatant Liar’ With ‘Selective Amnesia’

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 01:51 AM PST

From Malaysian Insider

Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim lashed out at Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamed over various accusations made against him in the former prime minister's newly-published autobiography.

"Dr Mahathir: (a) blatant liar (with) Selective amnesia.." Anwar told The Malaysian Insider via email today.

The country's longest-serving PM said in his autobiography out today that Anwar did not deny accusations of sodomy before being sacked as deputy prime minister and should have succeeded him as prime minister if not for his own actions.

Dr Mahathir, who stepped down in 2003, said that when Anwar was hauled up before the Umno supreme council, he "never once referred to the question of homosexuality, focusing only on the affairs with women."

In the book, Dr Mahathir also claimed that he had met four girls who said they were propositioned by Anwar for sex.

In response, Anwar said that Dr Mahathir's allegations were not new, and that he had consistently denied them since before he was sacked as deputy prime minister.

"I had denied the allegations publicly (refer to media) since 1997.

"His ref(erence) to the 4 women — I denied," said the PKR defacto leader.

Anwar also said that it was within the context of his denial in propositioning the four women for sex that he did not comment on the sodomy accusations.

"In that context I didn't mention "sodomy," Anwar told The Malaysian Insider.

Anwar was subsequently sacked from government before being charged and jailed for sodomy and corruption.

In his book, Dr Mahathir wrote that he had dismissed Anwar as deputy prime minister and likely successor for two reasons- "he was unsuitable to continue serving in the government and he was unsuitable to succeed me as prime minister."

Anwar however claimed today that his sacking as DPM was due to decisions made by him as the country's number two leader at the time.

"The reason for dismissal:

My decision for price waterhouse coopers to investigate financial malfinance of Tan Sri Eric Chia and Perwaja," said Anwar.

Anwar also said that Dr Mahathir saw his as a threat at the time, and was afraid of being challenged, as he (Anwar) knew about the corruption within Dr Mahathir's own family.

" (The) fear of being challenged;

Shares and contracts to Mokhzani (Mahathir) and Mukhriz (Mahathir) and bailout for Mirzan (Mahathir)," Anwar added.

Dr Mahathir, who was PM from 1981 to 2003, wrote that when Anwar "declared that he had done nothing unusual and insisted that everyone, including all the supreme council members, had done such things" when defending himself before Umno's top leadership.

In the book titled "A Doctor in the House: The Memoirs of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad," he said that he had first been told about Anwar's alleged homosexual activities in the early 1990s by then police chief Tun Hanif Omar.

Now the parliamentary opposition leader, Anwar was found guilty of corruption in 1999 and sodomy the next year.

He was jailed for six years before the Federal Court overturned his conviction for sodomy.

Four years later, he led the opposition pact to record gains in the March 2008 general election, denying Barisan Nasional its customary two-thirds majority of Parliament and seizing five states.

Anwar is now being tried for sodomy again, nearly three years after his former aide Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan first claimed to be the Permatang Pauh MP's victim.

MP KEADILAN Keluar Parti Untuk Bayar Hutang RM1.4 Juta

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 01:22 AM PST

Dari Keadilan Daily

Setiausaha Agung KEADILAN, Saifuddin Nasution Ismail mempersoal tindakan Ahli Parlimen KEADILAN yang keluar parti, baru-baru ini , disebabkan menerima wang dari pihak tertentu untuk membuat bayaran hutangnya.

"Cek pertama adalah cek tunai berjumlah RM700,000 dengan tarikh 12 Januari beralamat di sebuah bank di Ipoh manakala cek kedua adalah cek yang mempunyai tarikh sah laku sehingga 15 Mac dengan jumlah RM700,000.

"Cek itu beralamat syarikat milik Ahli Parlimen yang juga alamat kediamannya sendiri. Ia dibayar kepada tuan punya tanah dengan jumlah RM1.4 juta. Persoalannya, dari mana datangnya duit ini?" soalnya sambil menunjukkan bukti salinan bayaran cek berkenaan.

Terdahulu, Saifuddin berkata, Ahli Parlimen yang keluar KEADILAN itu membeli tanah pada 2010 dengan harga RM1.5 juta tetapi gagal membuat bayaran dalam masa 60 hari mengikut perjanjian.

"Saya mendapat salinan perjanjian antara Ahli Parlimen ini dengan pihak yang memiliki tanah. Perjanjian itu dibuat pada Mei 2010. Bayaran mesti dibuat, namun beliau tiada wang," katanya kepada KeadilanDaily di lobi Parlimen, hari ini.

Menyatakan maklumat itu diperoleh daripada pihak tertentu yang bersimpati dengan KEADILAN, Saifuddin berkata: "Kita ada dokumen dan mereka datang menemui saya menyerahkan bukti.

"Selepas membuat kajian, ia memang sah. Data itu adalah dokumen asal dan saya buat salinan.

"Tindakan ini dilakukan oleh mereka yang tidak tahan melihat lakonan Ahli Parlimen kononnya keluar parti mendakwa kononnya KEADILAN tidak membela rakyat," katanya yang sudah menjangka tindakan individu itu untuk keluar parti.

"Namun, mereka khianat sebab bertanding dan menang atas tiket KEADILAN. Kita sentiasa mempertahankan bahawa mereka yang mengkhianati parti adalah kerana mereka dibeli," kata Saifuddin.

Program Lawatan Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim ke Sabah

Posted: 08 Mar 2011 11:43 PM PST

11 Mac 2011 (Jumaat)

Ceramah dan Forum Tanah Adat: Isu, Polisi dan Cabaran di Sabah

Lokasi: The Palace Hotel, Karamunsing, Kota Kinabalu

Program:

2.00 – 2.45 ptg – Perasmian oleh YB Tian Chua

3.00 -3.45 ptg – Pembentangan Kertas Kerja 1 –

Hak Tanah Adat: Undang-Undang, Dasar & Cabaran

Pembentang – Datuk Kong Hong Ming

3.45 – 4.15 ptg – Pembentangan Kertas Kerja 2 –

Hak Tanah Adat – Dalam Kontex Risiko Tuduhan Jenayah

Pembentang – Mr. Ram Singh

6.00 – 6.45 ptg – Pembentangan Kertas Kerja 3 –

Tanah Adat Orang Asli di Negeri Selangor: Dasar &
Perlaksanaan Kerajaan Negeri Selangor di bawah Pakatan Rakyat

Pembentang – YB Elizabeth Wong

6.45 – 7.30 mlm – Pembentangan Kertas Kerja 4 -

Isu PTI & Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI)

Pembentang – Dr. Chong Eng Leong

8.15 – 9.30 mlm – Ceramah Perdana Oleh Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim

10.00 mlm – Mesyuarat Perhubungan KeADILan Sabah Bersama
Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim

Program Jelajah Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim Ke Selangor Sempena 3 Tahun Pemerintahan Kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat Selangor

Posted: 08 Mar 2011 11:39 PM PST

10 Mac 2011 (Khamis)

Program 1
9.00-12.00 malam – Ceramah – Ubah Sekarang / Selamatkan Malaysia

Lokasi: Stadium Jugra, Telok Datok, Banting

Penceramah:
1. YB Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim
2. YB Saifuddin Nasution
3. YB Khalid Samad
4. YB Manickam
5 . YB Dr Dzulkifli Ahmad
6. YB Abdullah Sani

Program 2
9.00-12.00 malam – Ceramah – Ubah Sekarang / Selamatkan Malaysia

Lokasi: Dewan Sukan Sri Andalas, Taman Sri Andalas, Kelang

Penceramah:
1. YB Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim
2. YB Azmin Ali
3. YB Saifuddin Nasution
4. YB Tian Chua
5. YB Ng Swee Lin
6. YB Xavier Jayakumar

The Great Subsidy Debate

Posted: 08 Mar 2011 11:38 PM PST

By Rafizi Ramli

Lately, subsidy has become somewhat a swear sword along the nation's corridors of power. Subsidy is primarily blamed for the nation's ballooning fiscal deficit that threatens to march Malaysia down the same path that Greece and Ireland had taken recently. The removal of subsidy thus has become a great national mission.

It is good that Malaysians are becoming more aware of the pros and cons of a social system that relies heavily on subsidy. A continuing reliance on subsidy to keep fuel prices down; or an expectation that our fuel prices will remain at today's prices for a foreseeable future is of course unrealistic for the simple reason that hydrocarbon resources are finite. Even if we have much larger oil and gas reserves that can last another 100 years, it is imprudent to waste it as cheap fuel given that it will become more costly to produce a barrel of oil twenty years from now. Any right thinking Malaysians understand that gradually we will live without fuel subsidy.

Where we differ is the manner the great national debate on subsidy is being selectively approached by the government, especially vis-a-vis the huge gas subsidy given to the energy sector and the amount of debt servicing charges the public has to absorb each year. Both feature prominently in any solution to reduce fiscal deficits.

For the record, the national budget for 2011 allocates 8.7% out of the total RM212 billion operational budget for debt servicing charges for all the loans taken and guaranteed by the Federal Government. This works out to be RM18.4 billion of interest and principal payments annually. The number should strike a chord instantly for those who are familiar with the mathematics of subsidy in Malaysia, because it is a lot higher than the fuel and food subsidy that the Federal Government bears each year.

When the crude oil price shot through the roof in 2008, the total fuel subsidy borne by the government was RM15 billion (based on data released by Pemandu). In normal circumstances when crude oil price hovers in between US$65 to US$85 per barrel, the estimated fuel subsidy is in between RM9 billion to RM11 billion annually.

Therefore, this is a fact – even when the crude oil price repeats the dramatic increase of 2008 (which we have not seen so far), the total fuel subsidy borne by the government is still lower than the debt servicing charges. In normal circumstances, Malaysia spends double the amount of public money servicing the debts that the Federal Government has accumulated over the years; which has reached RM407 billion by the end of 2010.

Thus, while it is right to focus on subsidy removal as a means to reduce the national fiscal deficit, the public must be bolder to press for a concrete plan to reduce our debt servicing charges over the years. Debt servicing is a bigger culprit and it is about time that the public calls a spade a spade, especially in light of the government's mad rush to issue bonds to fund for the billions worth of mega projects announced under ETP. A pre-occupation with subsidy removal to the point that we lose sight of the imprudent debt raised annually by the Federal Government is a mistake we cannot afford as a nation.

Is there a necessity for austerity measures to trim down the national budget, so that we scale down the annual borrowing to fund the budget deficit? Can we live with a period of modest economic growth while we tackle the problem of high debt level? I do not have the answer to this but eventually we will arrive at a junction when we cannot avoid the questions anymore, so it is best to start the public discourse now. Either way, every Malaysia will agree that eliminating corruption and shoddy government procurement practices will go a long way to manage the reliance on debt.

The other economic question that should be weighed heavily in any national debate on subsidy is the RM19 billion-question on gas subsidy provided to the energy sector each year. It is a sore point to PETRONAS which complains annually on this as it is akin to burning RM19 billion of good money for the sake of keeping the electricity tariff artificially low. Even if we have an abundance of gas reserves (which we don't), burning that amount of natural gas each year is environmentally harmful and economically wasteful when it can fetch a much higher price if utilised differently (either as LNG or feedstock for processed chemicals).

The proponent of the RM19 billion gas subsidy to the energy sector will argue that it is necessary to help the rakyat, as the cheaper tariff benefits the rakyat directly. That is a political argument that goes along the same breath as the economic argument that an energy subsidy is necessary to make Malaysia competitive as a manufacturing hub.

Personally, there are loopholes in both arguments.

A research by Jeff Rector of Stanford University discovered that the rakyat (non-business and non-industry users) consumes only 19% of the total electricity generation in Malaysia in 2005. TNB has also made a few changes to the public tariff structure since then that in all probability there will not be a sudden tariff hike for low capacity users such as the public if the gas subsidy is phased out.

The industrial and commercial sectors have the right to be jittery when any proposal to phase out the gas subsidy to the energy sector is made, because they stand to bear the full brunt having consumed 81% of the total electricity generation. But this is where the practical and philosophical questions on gas subsidy require an in-depth discussion(which has been conveniently ignored by the government):

Firstly – there is a big disconnect between the drive towards a high income economy driven by higher innovation and creative capital; with the insistence that our industrial sector will continue to be protected in the form of cheap electricity tariff paid for by the state. An economy that can still benefit greatly from state give-outs(either in the form of bloated state contracts or state subsidies)will resist any attempts at structural reforms, as it is only natural that human beings will choose an easier option. Why go through the pains of economic reforms to change the structure of the economy, when our industry can still make tonnes of money producing products with lower technology and creative contents because the state subsidy distorts the manufacturing costs?

Secondly – even if in the end, there is a consensus that our industry still requires some form of subsidy to maintain its competitiveness,the economic and tariff data clearly show that the RM19 billion gas subsidy does not translate to cheaper tariff. There is a huge leakage and this leakage must be plugged immediately.

Thailand is a good example of how cheaper tariff can be achieved without spending too much on "corporate subsidies" in the form of massive gas subsidy to the energy sector annually. Gas price sold to the energy sector in Thailand is tightly pegged to the market price of gas sourced domestically and from long term supply contracts of neighbouring suppliers (such as Myanmar). On top of the raw gas price,the formula also includes charges for pipeline tariff, marketing margin and indexed to consumer price index, foreign exchange movement
and producer price index. The long and short of it is the power producers in Thailand pay a market price for the gas – almost at RM31per mmbtu when the crude oil reaches US$100 per barrel mark (compare that with the RM10.70 per mmbtu sold to the energy sector in Malaysia).

Interestingly (and unfortunately), Thailand's electricity tariff is a lot cheaper than Malaysia's in spite of Malaysia's heavy subsidy system in place to supposedly keep the electricity tariff low. A residential consumer in Thailand only pays 18 sen per kWh for the first 150 kWh used; compared to Malaysia's tariff for equivalent usage of 22 sen per kWh. That is a difference of 22% higher tariff in Malaysia.

Similarly, retail customers under the category of "low voltage commercial tariff" also pay higher tariff in Malaysia compared to the equivalent electricity consumption in Thailand. The tariff is 37 sen per kWh in Malaysia, 48% higher than Thailand's tariff of 25 sen per kWh for the same category of consumption.

The list of comparison can go on and on.

It is good that Malaysians are more aware of how our economy is run or where the taxpayers' money is being spent. It is encouraging that people begin to think long term and question the viability of a social system that hinges heavily on subsidy.

But any discussion on subsidy removal must be honest and fair to everyone. For the time being, the deafening silence on the RM19 billion gas subsidy that seems to benefit only a minor section of the society, or the complete black out on the worrying level of public debt; is entirely unfair to the country and future generation.

Mission Achieved: Anwar Dragged Through Mud

Posted: 08 Mar 2011 11:16 PM PST

‘The prosecution is not worried about the DNA evidence being expunged because they have created a doubt – that Anwar did sodomise Saiful.’

Prosecution will not appeal ruling

Multi Racial: It unlawful extraction of evidence is inadmissible and it was a landmark ruling by the Federal Court then the prosecution should know about it.

The question is that why they still proceed? Well, there are only two possible answers. Either that are inefficient or they did it deliberately to have this part of the evidence reported to the public.

This is to give the opportunity to BN control media to paint the guilty picture so that many rural folks will see it that way. If the latter is true then it is politically motivated and got nothing to do with the case. The government and the police knew all along they got no case on Anwar Ibrahim.

Kgen: One would expect the prosecution to appeal all the way to the Federal Court and they had never failed to win. That they do not want to appeal shows that the verdict was pre-planned. Umno may have realised that it is against their interest to jail Anwar.

With the DNA evidence disqualified the prosecution has no case so we can expect Anwar to be acquitted for lack of evidence. However Umno has achieved its purpose of dragging Anwar through mud.

JBGUY: The whole trial was a sham. The prosecution is not worried about the DNA evidence being expunged because they are banking on the fact that they have created a doubt – that Anwar did sodomise Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan. This is all Umno needs to refer to this in the GE campaigns by saying that Anwar got away through a technicality.

Now, naturally most people who are not exposed to the BN Machiavellian moves may buy into this and believe this lie. So Anwar, you are checkmated despite your innocence. How I wish people would use their heads to think for themselves but knowing the people in this country that’s unlikely.

Peter Clement Goh: With this ruling, Umno still wins, the West will look at the judiciary as “fair”, but since the evidence already shows that the DNA of those three articles match the one planted into Saiful’s arse, Anwar will still be “guilty” by those in Malaysia who see the print media as gospel truth. It looks like no matter which way the verdict goes, Anwar’s credibility is now down the drain.

Cala: Who is Saiful? When the evidence relating to the DNA found in three items (a mineral water bottle, a ‘Good Morning’ towel, and a toothbrush) had been expunged by the court, only Saiful’s testimony can wage a challenge to the defence, said Karpal.

But is Saiful a credible witness? Is he a reliable person? Do you trust him? Did he behave as someone who was a victim of sodomy? He said he went to the bathroom and came out clad in a towel before the said encounter with Anwar;

Secondly, he was seen entertaining some guests in Anwar’s office the day after the said incident. If you are puzzled by Saiful’s action as usual behaviour, what then had caused his attitudinal change?

How do you explain that? Could it be that there was an incentive offered to him so huge that he could not possibly refuse?

Anonymous_3f94: It should be obvious to everyone by now that Anwar’s blood from Sodomy I was mixed with Saiful’s semen and inserted up Saiful’s rectum with the use of a plastic syringe. This is the plastic object referred to when Saiful told the first doctor he saw at Hospital Pusrawi that his anus had a plastic object inserted.

Saiful is not gay, but because the plot had to be adhered to with the corresponding juicy payoffs, he allowed the officer (assigned to him by Najib Razak) to insert the syringe up his rear end at a room at the Concorde Hotel when he met him after meeting Najib, and before going to the hospital.

That also explains the apparent presence of Anwar’s DNA at the front (not the back) of Saiful’s underwear as the liquid from the syringe could easily have been jettisoned forward, when Saiful was bending over, with the officer manipulating the syringe from behind him. The dripping of excess fluid would fall onto the front, and not the rear of his underpants.

Lim Chong Leong: The night is still young. They will plant some other damning evidence some place else. Umno is dead set on getting rid of Anwar, so this is not the end of the persecution.

At the same time, Najib can say the police may be slightly dirty but the judiciary and the attorney-general are clean. We must remember that the big picture includes Altantuya Shaariibuu, Scorpene, space tourists, PKFZ, BMF, Proton, MAS, APs, Sime Darby, Perwaja, and on, and on, and on.

2CTS WORTH: Prosecution will not appeal? I thought this is the ace up their sleeves. Appeal cannot be allowed? This is incredulous. At last some order is being adhered to, or is it? I am dying in suspense.

So even if it’s illegal, it’s admissible?

Kyw: If they had not obtained Anwar’s DNA legally or illegally, how are they going to implant it into Saiful’s anus? Now the question is: Did Amwar’s DNA really reside there or was it implanted by those ‘kidnappers’?

Since they had not arrested Anwar legally, all these must have been done illegally. As such, we must give Anwar the benefit of the doubt.

Annachan: Anything that can become law or is passed by Parliament to become law must have its indispensable elements of morality. Law without morality cannot be enforced in any part of the world.

Morality is about right or wrong, good or bad, the right to go on living and not the right to interfere with another person’s right or to kill him. Any law that is not imbued with morality cannot stand alone and cannot even exist.

If any judge were to allow an illegal piece of evidence or an illegally obtained evidence to stand in court, then that country is an uncivilised country. The judges and the lawyers who represent that court is not learned in the law. That court will be the laughing stock of the world.

Dicey Rules: It looks to me like “procurement (of evidence) by deception”. It involves the misuse of official power and the misrepresentation of official purposes.

If you take home a government pencil and use it for your own purposes, that is the appropriation and “conversion” of public resources to an illicit private use. It is in principle the same (but in practice far worse) with the grabbing for personal or partisan use of official power and authority.

Here, in this instance, it’s not just a pencil that has been grabbed to write a shopping list. It is the procurement (without any adequate safeguard or protection for the integrity of the chain of transmission and custodianship) of apparent evidence in a strategy of illicit entrapment.

From its origins, from the very outset, this stratagem is fatally tainted. Any court that can find this move permissible is not in the business being an honest arbiter but of self-serving arbitrariness. Try arguing otherwise!

Hibiscus: Such a blatant gross injustice to a political leader who has a very large following. This is like the government is telling the rakyat not to trust the law to provide justice. This affront to justice is tempting the creation of a climate for anarchy.

I fear to think that if BN loses the next GE, it will precipitate unrest by convicting and jailing DSAI (Anwar), thus giving it the reason to impose emergency rule.

Ah Hoe: The aim of the trial was two-fold – firstly, to distract Anwar from the political process of building up a challenge to Umno, and secondly, to discredit Anwar as a leader of good morals. In both, I’m afraid they have succeeded.

Kenyataan Datuk Seri Dr. Wan Azizah Wan Ismail Tentang PRK Kerdau dan Merlimau

Posted: 08 Mar 2011 11:14 PM PST

Keputusan pilihanraya kecil di Merlimau dan Kerdau yang baru sahaja berlangsung pada 6 Mac lalu sememangnya telah diduga. Selain menyedari dua DUN tersebut adalah kubu kuat BN kita dapati imbuhan keterlaluan telah dilemparkan kepada pengundi. KEADILAN mendesak supaya SPR dapat bertindak dengan bebas dan berkecuali serta peka terhadap aduan-aduan yang diajukan oleh kedua-dua belah pihak secara adil dan telus.

KEADILAN mengucapkan tahniah dan syabas kepada petugas PR yang terpaksa menongkah arus dengan berhadapan jentera gergasi BN. Apatah lagi seluruh jentera kerajaan diguna sewenangnya. Media arus perdana pula kekal tempang dan begitu mudah diperkudakan.

Pakatan Rakyat akan mengorak langkah bagi menghadapi pilihanraya Sarawak dan PRU13. Gerakerja tersusun di setiap peringkat perlu dimulakan sekarang. Kemenangan dua PRK ini pastinya menjadikan BN selesa dan memanggil PRU13 seawal mungkin. PR harus terus mendekati rakyat kerana kesejahteraan rakyat tidak memadai dengan gula-gula pilihanraya. Apa-apapun, kita harapkan SPR akan lebih telus dan bebas lantas mengizinkan sistem demokrasi di negara ini dilaksanakan sebaik mungkin. Amat penting untuk kita menyelamatkan negara demi kesejahteraan berpanjangan.

Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail

Wee Choo Keong

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 03:25 PM PST

Wee Choo Keong


Thank you MATTA for responding

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 09:47 AM PST

Thank you MATTA for replying to my posting on the MATTA Travel Fair, in HERE.  Whilst I appreciate that all exhibitors are licenced by the Ministry of Tourism and also registered with SSM. Unfortunately, we still hear about travel agents absconded with big sum of monies collected from their customers for tour charges and/or flight [...]

Anak Muda Kampung Nak Senang

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 11:28 AM PST

Anak Muda Kampung Nak Senang


Umno Taman Rasa Sayang Seremban didakwa sebar fitnah

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 01:10 AM PST




Ingkar perintah Agong: KEADILAN Rembau lapor polis
9 Mac 2011

SEREMBAN: KEADILAN Rembau dan PAS Paroi hari ini membuat laporan polis
menggesa siasatan berkenaan kertas mesyuarat tahunan Umno Cawangan Taman Rasa Sayang, Bahagian Rembau kerana didakwa mengandungi isu perkauman dan fitnah.

Ini juga berikutan ahli Umno di cawangan berkenaan tidak menghormati dan
mengingkari titah Yang Dipertuan Agong, Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin yangmahu rakyat negara ini tidak membangkitkan isu sensitif menyentuh
perkauman.

"Antara yang jelas ditimbulkan mereka adalah isu agama dan perkauman.
Ini cukup membuktikan mereka ingkar dengan titah Tuanku Mizan supaya
menjauhi amalan ini," kata Setiausaha Cabang KEADILAN Rembau, Nor Azizi
A Aziz sambil menunjukkan bukti beberapa gambar di dalam kertas
mesyuarat itu yang didakwa boleh mencetuskan perbalahan kaum.

Kertas mesyuarat tahunan 2011 tersebut mengandungi lapan halaman yang
keseluruhannya menerbitkan perihal sentiviti kaum.

Antara tulisan pada salah satu gambar yang terpampang wajah Penasihat
DAP, Lim Kit Siang berbunyi, "Kita hapuskan hak Melayu, kita tolak
Islam, mari bersama kami, PAS, PKR dan DAP!!".

Nor Azizi yang mewakili ketuanya, Badrul Hisham Shaharin berkata,
perkara itu dipandang serius kerana melibatkan penyuburan budaya politik
kotor di kalangan penyokong parti.

"Oleh itu, kami menuntut polis menyiasat supaya tindakan membudayakan
fitnah dan adu domba seperti ini dielakkan untuk kepentingan politik
pihak tertentu bertujuan melihat perpecahan antara kaum di negara kita,"
katanya di hadapan Ibu Pejabat Polis Daerah Seremban pada sidang media
selepas laporan itu dibuat.

"Apa yang kita mahukan adalah politik matang kerana kerajaan Pakatan
Rakyat (PR) menganjurkan pengetahuan politik dengan penghujahan untuk
membawa rakyat kepada pemilihan parti yang layak disokong.

"Tapi (apa) yang dilakukan Umno itu tidak menggambarkan sikap
profesional mereka menghadapi parti pembangkang, sebaliknya menghentam
perkara yang mengingkari titah Agong," kata Nor Azizi.

Sementara itu, PAS yang diwakili Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri Paroi,
Mohamad Taufek Ab Ghani turut menyelar tindakan Umno dan menggesa supaya penyiasatan segera dilakukan polis dan Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) terhadap Umno Taman Rasa Sayang itu.

"Jika usaha-usaha jahat ini tidak dihentikan, ia akan membawa kepada
permusuhan dan kebencian antara kaum yang akhirnya menggugat kestabilan
dan keamanan negara.

"Pelbagai tuduhan palsu dan fitnah dilemparkan kepada pemimpin PR untuk
menimbulkan kebencian rakyat," kata Taufek.

http://www.keadilandaily.com/ingkar-perintah-agong-keadilan-rembau-lapor-polis-2/

PAKATAN LEADERS MALIGNED IN UMNO DOCUMENT
Zefry Dahalan March 9, 2011

PKR lodges police report against Taman Rasa Sayang Umno branch in Senawang for seditious statements and pictures fanning racial tensions

SEREMBAN: The Taman Rasa Sayang Umno branch in Senawang under the Rembau division earned the ire of Pakatan Rakyat for instigating tensions between the Malays and Chinese.

Rembau PKR secretary, Norazizi Abdul Aziz, said an eight-page document appended to the minutes the Umno's division annual meeting contains seditious statements and pictures maligning Pakatan leaders.

"The contents of the document, dated March 5, is seditious and designed to instigate racial tensions among the Malays and the Chinese in Pakatan," said Norazizi after lodging a police report at the

district police headquarters here.

Titled "Pendedahan Untuk Kesedaran" it has a picture of DAP advisor Lim Kit Siang under a sub-heading heading which reads: "DAP Anti Islam" and the words "Ketuanan Rakyat" (proposed by Pakatan Rakyat) was changed to "Ketuanan Cina".

Another picture shows Kit Siang delivering a speech and the caption reads: "Kita hapuskan hak Melayu, kita tolak Islam! Mari bersama kami, PAS, PKR dan DAP"

PKR's de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim is portrayed as a No 1 liar and branded as a traitor of the Malays, Muslims and the nation.

Disrespecting the King

Kelantan Menteri Besar and PAS spiritual leader Nik Aziz was not spared either.

A caricature depicts Taiping MP and former Perak exco member Nga Kor Ming as an imam leading a prayer session with Nik Aziz and Anwar behind Kor Ming.

The prayer rug used by Muslims called "sejadah" has the DAP logo on it. Nik Aziz and Anwar are caricatured on prayer rugs with their respective party logos.

Rembau PAS chief, Mohd Taufek Abdul Ghani, slammed Umno for showing disrespect to King's speech at the opening of the new parliament session Monday, where he said narrow racial sentiments must be nipped in the bud before they festered in the community.

Mohd Taufek urged Umno not to resort to cheap and dangerous tactics to divide the races.

The Umno meeting was officiated by Negeri Sembilan Menteri Besar who is also the Rembau Umno chief.

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/2011/03/09/pakatan-leaders-maligned-in-umno-document/

Saman ekor bawa motor tak pakai tali pinggang, BANGANG

Posted: 08 Mar 2011 03:46 PM PST


Ini memang bangang dan bodoh namanya. Ada ke orang kita di Sabah ni kena saman ekor sebab bawa motosikal tidak pakai tali pinggang keledar? Bukankah ini menunjukkan sistem Saman Ekor ni hari demi hari menunjukkan KEBODOHAN, KEBANGANGAN dan KEDEGILAN pihak polis termasuk MENTERI dan PERDANA MENTERInya sekali? Cukuplah, hentikanlah mengugut rakyat suruh bayar saman ekor. Lebih banyak kes bodoh begini akan keluar dalam akhbar.

Sebelum ni atok umur 85 tahun di saman ekor bawa motosikal kuasa besar 500cc, kisahnya di http://amkns.blogspot.com/2011/01/warga-emas-malukan-pdrm-dan-menteri.html

POLIS PERLU PASTIKAN DATA SAMAN EKOR TEPAT ELAK KEKELIRUAN
BERITA HARIAN 9 Mac 2011

HAMPIR semua rakyat mempunyai saman yang perlu dijelaskan menyokong perlanjutan tempoh pembayaran saman.

Bukan kerana tidak mahu membayar, tetapi disebabkan sibuk dengan tugasan harian dan tidak menyedari mereka mempunyai 'saman ekor'. Saman bermaksud mengenakan hukuman atau denda kepada pesalah trafik dengan harapan pesalah tidak mengulangi kesalahan terbabit. Masalahnya, apakah matlamat saman dikeluarkan terutama 'saman ekor'? Apakah saman itu dikeluarkan dengan betul kepada pesalah trafik? Apakah nombor pendaftaran kenderaan juga betul?

Apa yang dikesali, apabila saya membuat pemeriksaan saman di Ibu Pejabat Polis (IPD) Penampang, didapati sebuah kenderaan didaftar atas nama saya disaman pada 2005 oleh PDRM daerah Tawau. Tetapi, kenderaan itu digunakan di Kota Kinabalu sejak 2000 hingga 2008.

Pada 2008 barulah kenderaan itu dihantar ke Tawau untuk kegunaan anak saya.

Lebih mengejutkan, apabila diperiksa kesalahan itu, kenderaan saya adalah motosikal, tetapi disaman atas kesalahan 'tidak memakai tali pinggang keledar'.

Apabila saya menjelaskan perkara itu kepada pegawai terbabit, saya dinasihatkan merujuk kepada IPD pengeluar saman di Tawau.

Saya yakin bukan hanya saya seorang menghadapi keadaan sebegitu berhubung 'saman ekor' di negara ini bahkan ramai lagi tetapi tidak ingin membesar-besarkannya.

Sepatutnya, sebelumnya pihak polis mengeluarkan saman, terutamanya 'saman ekor', pastikan dulu data kenderaan adalah betul. Jangan hanya mengutamakan kuantiti tetapi kualiti diabaikan.

EMJAY'S@Mojasa06,
Bundusan, Penampang.

http://www.bharian.com.my/bharian/articles/Polisperlupastikandatasamanekortepatelakkekeliruan/Article

keADILan Kuala Pilah

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 09:48 AM PST

keADILan Kuala Pilah


HJ. OTHMAN ADAM MENINGGAL DUNIA

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 05:21 AM PST

MOH...KITE LAWAN YEOP!!!

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 09:28 AM PST

MOH...KITE LAWAN YEOP!!!


Siapa MP keADILan Tuuu !!!!!

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 09:03 AM PST

PRU di negeri-negari PR berasingan : Bahaya

Posted: 08 Mar 2011 06:32 PM PST

Oleh salmanalbustaniy

"Rakyat Selangor mula melihat kebaikan kerajaan PR, begitulah di negeri-negeri PR yang lain. Pertambahan sokongan rakyat di Selangor insya Allah akan bertambah. Walaubagaimanapun, PR mesti melihat dan menjangkakan muslihat dan perancangan BN untuk tawan Selangor khususnya dalam PRU depan.

Cuba lihat baru-baru ini orang Sabah daftar mengundi di Shah Alam. Bukan seorang, tapi berbondong-bondong dengan perancangan rapi BN dan JPN.

Katakan seramai 5000 orang berjaya didaftarkan di Parlimen Shah Alam, dan parlimen-parlimen yang lain, dan Selangor buat PRU berasingan, maka sesudah mereka mengundi di Sabah dan Sarawak, mereka serang PR habis-habisan, maka merudumlah Selangor. Kalau dibuat serentak barangkali perancangan mereka banyak tergendala. Ini memang perancangan jahat BN.

Bukan setakat pengundi Sabah dan Sarawak akan jahanamkan PR bahkan mereka barangkali akan aturkan orang Johor, Melaka, Negri Sembilan, Perak, Perlis, Kedah, Terengganu, Kelantan, akan datang sebagai pengundi hantu menyerang Selangor dan Penang serta Kedah. Manakala Kelantan barangkali sedikit sukar.

Siapa tidak kenal BN. Cuba diingat kembali PRU 2004, PAS tumbang di Terengganu tinggal 4 DUN sahaja, Parlimen Marang pun kecundang. Kenapa? "Grand design" oleh BN kata Dato Mustapa Ali. Terengganu mengalami pertambahan pengundi baru di luar jangkaan. Dan Kelantan juga hampir tumbang ke tangan BN, hanya 2 kerusi sahaja yang membezakan PAS dan UMNO, dan selepas itu bertahan dengan 1 kerusi. Alhamdulillah. Dato Husam Musa sendiri dalam analisis pilihanraya 2004 juga mengakui adanya grand design oleh BN untuk tumbangkan PAS di Kelantan dan telah berjaya di Terengganu. Kalau pilihanraya bersama pun BN boleh buat, apatah lagi kalau 4 negeri PR buat berasingan.

Dengan pengalaman lepas sepatutnya PR lebih berhati-hati. Walaupun di Selangor nampak kebaikan kerajaan PR, kebiasaannya perancangan kejahatan BN diatur dengan licik dan rapi demi merampas balik negeri terkaya itu. Bukankah Najib sendiri Pengerusi UMNO Selangor. Masih tidak kenalkah siapa Najib? Baru-baru ini Harakah ada membongkarkan pertambahan pengundi yang sangat ketara di Parlimen Pekan, kawasan Najib. Hampir 10000 lebih pengundi baru, kebanyakannya dari utara.

Sinar hari ini 8 Mac 2011 muka depan Tan Sri MB Selangor kata jangan berangan rampas Selangor! Itu satu cabaran kepada BN. Meluap ammarah BN dengan kata-kata MB. Mereka pasti dendam dan akan melipatgandakan kerja untuk tumbangkan PR di Selangor. Kenyataan tersebut walaupun pada pandangan Tan Sri untuk menunjukkan kekuatan PR, ia diambil sebagai satu cabaran oleh BN. Sudah pasti BN akan ajar PR dan TanSri. Najib sendiri mengeluarkan kata-katanya biar berkecai badan, Putra Jaya pasti akan dipertahankan! Makna tersiratnya juga boleh difahami biar berkecai badan, Selangor akan ku TUMBANGKAN!

Pimpinan PR perlu elakkan daripada mengeluarkan kata-kata bongkak dan angkuh. Alangkah baiknya kalau Tan Sri MB berkata : PR akan sedaya upaya pertahankan kerajaan di Selangor demi kebajikan rakyat. Lebih baik daripada jangan berangan nak rampas Selangor!

Suka saya menyorot kenyataan Presiden PAS dalam ruangan editor Harakah terkini yang berpesan supaya masyarakat perlu didekati dengan dakwah secara berhikmah, baik melalui tulisan mahupun ungkapan. Bagi pemerintah di negeri-negeri PR, pesanan itu perlu dipedulikan. Termasuk pemerintah Kelantan.

Masyarakat yang jauh daripada media bebas terutamanya di kawasan luar bandar dan Felda mereka perlu didekati dengan dakwah secara hikmah. Ungkapan tidak undi Islam adalah komunis, Jahiliyyah, dan undi PAS masuk syurga perlu dihentikan. Tiada gunanya PAS BARU sebagaimana saranan Dr. Mujahid Rawa sekiranya ada pemimpin PAS yang masih suka melabelkan komunis, jahiliyyah dan undi PAS masuk syurga. Sebab media BN pasti sepantas kilat akan memainkan isu tersebut dan sudah pasti orang Melayu yang pekat kebiruannya menyampah dengan PAS dan sukar agenda "PAS GANTI UMNO" akan tercapai. Menyebabkan orang Melayu luar bandar dan Felda semakin biru dengan kebiruannya dan ia menjadi nilai tambah kepada grand design ciptaan BN untuk tumbangkan PR khususnya di Selangor. Maaf, pinjam kata-kata pelawak Nabil : Lu pikirlah sendiri!"

Sumber: http://www.detikdaily.net/v5/

Peneroka-Peneroka Jengka 22 dibayar kembali CESS atau ditambah dengan hutang yang baru?

Posted: 08 Mar 2011 06:30 PM PST

Pada 27hb Februari 2011, Dato Seri Najib Tun Razak, Perdana Menteri Malaysia, telah berkunjung ke Felda Jengka 22 dan telah membuat pengumuman yang diterima dengan gembira oleh peneroka-peneroka Felda disana.

Dato Najib menjanjikan bahawa Kerajaan/Felda akan mengembalikan semula wang cess kepada peneroka-peneroka Felda Jengka 22 dan peneroka-peneroka hendaklah membuat salah satu daripada tiga pilihan.

Pilihan pertama: Peneroka-peneroka boleh memilih untuk menerima bayaran sebanyak RM13,000.00 dengan syarat peneroka-peneroka membayar kembali dalam bentuk BK (Bayaran Kembali) sebanyak RM650.00 setiap bulan kepada Felda;

Pilihan kedua: Peneroka-peneroka boleh memilih untuk menerima bayaran sebanyak RM6000.00 dengan syarat peneroka-peneroka membayar kembali kepada Felda dalam bentuk BK (Bayaran Kembali) sebanyak RM550.00 setiap bulan;

Pilihan ketiga: Peneroka-peneroka boleh memilih tidak mahu menerima bayaran (samada RM13,000.00 atau RM6000.00) dengan syarat peneroka-peneroka membayar kembali kepada Felda dalam bentuk BK (Bayaran Kembali) sebanyak RM400.00 setiap bulan.

Semasa didalam kesibukan kempen Pilihanraya Kecil Dewan Undangan Negeri Kerdau (PRK DUN Kerdau), kakitangan Felda telah mengunjungi semua penduduk Felda Jengka 22 untuk mendapatkan persetujuan masing-masing samada mahu memilih pilihan pertama atau pilihan kedua dan pilihan ketiga.

Majoriti daripada peneroka-peneroka memilih untuk menerima bayaran kembali cess ini dengan pilihan pertama iaitu sebanyak RM13,000.00.

Pada 7hb Mac 2011, Felda telah menunaikan bayaran itu dengan mengeluarkan cek kepada semua peneroka-peneroka yang bersetuju menerima bayaran tersebut.

Pihak UMNO/BN dan Felda telah mendabik dada mengatakan bahawa janji Perdana Menteri untuk menjelaskan RM13,000.00 kepada peneroka-peneroka telah ditunaikan.

Apakah bayaran RM13,000.00 ini bayaran pengembalian wang cess kepada peneroka-peneroka tidak dijelaskan oleh Kerajaan/Felda.

Wang cess adalah sebahagian dari wang yang dipotong dari setiap harga komoditi bertujuan untuk tanaman semula kepada pekebun-pekebun kecil getah yang mahu menanam semula. Wang yang terkumpul adalah suatu jumlah mengikut keluasan tanah getah masing-masing dan untuk tanah getah seluas 10 ekar seperti yang diperuntukkan kepada peneroka-peneroka getah adalah sejumlah RM18,000.00.

Pada Pilihanraya Umum 2008, Kerajaan UMNO/BN melalui Felda telah membayar kepada peneroka-peneroka sebanyak RM5000.00, dan berbaki lagi sebanyak RM13,000.00.

Maka RM13,000.00 itu dikeluarkan untuk peneroka-peneroka Felda Jengka 22 yang berhadapan dengan Pilihanraya Kecil DUN Kerdau.

Tetapi adakah benar RM13,000.00 itu adalah bayaran dari wang cess. Wang cess adalah dikeluarkan oleh Risda untuk tujuan tanam semula (dari getah ke getah atau dari getah ke kelapa sawit) dan bayaran itu dibuat secara berperingkat-peringkat semasa tanam semula dijalankan; keadaan itu berlaku kepada pekebun-pekebun kecil diluar rancangan Felda dan kepada peneroka-peneroka Felda yang menanam sendiri.

Apabila seseorang peneroka Felda menanam semula melalui Felda, maka wang cess itu dibayar kepada Felda untuk tujuan tanam semula, dan tidak ada lagi wang cess yang perlu dikembalikan kepada peneroka-peneroka, dan wang cess itu ditolak untuk kos tanam semula.

Oleh hal yang demikian itu, adakah bayaran sejumlah RM13,000.00 ini sebagai pengembalian wang cess kepada peneroka-peneroka atau RM13,000.00 itu sebagai tambahan pinjaman yang didahulukan oleh Felda kepada peneroka-peneroka dan dikategorikan sebagai "tambahan hutang".

Persoalan ini telah dikemukakan kepada pihak tertentu di Kementerian berkenaan, dan pihak itu menyatakan bahawa beliau tidak ada jawapan kepada persoalan ini, kerana ini adalah tindakan politik.

Jika wang RM13,000.00 itu sebagai wang cess yang dikembalikan kepada peneroka-peneroka, kenapa pula peneroka-peneroka kena membayar kembali kepada Felda untuk BK sebanyak RM650.00 setiap bulan? Hanya hutang dibayar kembali kepada Felda, dan pengembalian wang cess, apa ada keperluan untuk dibayar kembali?

Ini bererti wang RM13,000.00 itu akan dimasukkan kedalam hutang setiap peneroka Felda. Peneroka-peneroka Felda Jengka 22 sehingga bulan Mac 2011 telah berhutang dengan Felda sebanyak RM72,000.00 (dan jumlah itu sedang bertambah) dan dengan bayaran RM13,000.00 ini maka hutang peneroka-peneroka Jengka 22 akan bertambah menjadi RM85,000.00.

Peneroka-peneroka Jengka 22 kena membayar BK mereka setiap bulan sebanyak RM650.00 berbanding dengan bayaran BK mereka sekarang sebanyak RM250.00.

Didalam tempoh 15 tahun akan datang, peneroka-peneroka Felda Jengka 22 kena membayar sebanyak RM111,000.00 dan ditambah dengan hutang sehingga bulan Mac 2011 sebanyak RM72,000.00, maka hutang peneroka-peneroka Felda Jengka 22 adalah sebanyak RM183,000.00.

Mampukah peneroka-peneroka yang sejumlah besarnya sudah mencapai umur 60 tahun dan keatas itu menjelaskan hutang mereka didalam tempoh hayat mereka?

Jerat atau perangkap BN/UMNO dan Felda ini bukan sahaja kepada mereka yang menerima bayaran RM13,000.00 itu tetapi juga kepada mereka yang tidak mahu menerima bayaran RM13,000.00 atau RM6000.00 iaitu sebanyak RM400.00 sebulan.

Mereka yang tidak mahu menerima pun menanggung beban bayaran RM400.00 setiap bulan berjumlah RM72,000.00 (RM400.00 x 12 bulan x 15 tahun).

Peneroka-peneroka yang tidak mahu menerima RM13,000.00 itu terdiri daripada peneroka-peneroka yang tidak menanam semula melalui Felda (tanam sendiri) atau peneroka-peneroka yang mengambil alih pengurusan ladang masing-masing dari Felda untuk mengelakkan hutang mereka bertambah.

Tetapi mereka juga tidak terkecuali dan melalui sekim UMNO/BN dan Felda ini, mereka juga akan dikenakan hutang baru sebanyak RM72,000.00.

Perbuatan UMNO/BN dan Felda ini adalah helah mereka untuk mencari dana untuk Felda yang kini sudah amat berkurangan kerana wang Felda sudah dibazirkan oleh pimpinan UMNO/BN untuk perbelanjaan-perbelanjaan yang tidak ada kena mengena dengan pembangunan peneroka-peneroka Felda!

Sumber: http://lubokkawah.blogspot.com/

Parti KeADILan Rakyat, Gopeng * 务边人民公正党

Posted: 09 Mar 2011 09:04 AM PST

Parti KeADILan Rakyat, Gopeng * 务边人民公正党


李文材:从轻发落提控马华巨头只是放烟雾弹之举

Posted: 08 Mar 2011 05:40 PM PST

(怡保8日讯)务边区国会议员李文材质疑总检察署没有提控负责掌控自贸区总承包商Kuala Dimensi(KDSB)兼砂拉越民都鲁国会议员张庆信,相反地只是以最轻的罪名提控两名前马华巨头兼前任交通部长,这肯定是放烟雾弹之举,企图挽回民众对我国司法制度恢复信心。   "每当国阵政治人物被提控都是以最轻的罪名下被检控甚至无罪释放,包括之前的基尔基宫土地贿赂案,以及拥有贪污记录的巫统领袖莫哈末伊沙,依然可以出任联邦土地发展局(FELDA)主席一职。"   他表示,倘若要展现司法制度是公平和不受操控,检察署必须将巴生自贸区舞弊案的全部潜在串谋者一网打尽,并且以最重的罪名提控他们展现肃贪的勇气,不要选择性让巫统的大鱼落跑。   他是在日前于翠林镇座谈会上发表这样的演说。其他演讲嘉宾包括公正党全国总秘书赛夫丁、全国公青团副团长曾敏凯、公正党通讯局主任聂纳兹米、公正党策略局主任拉菲兹、回教党霹雳州第二署理主席凯鲁丁医生、回教党务边区部署理主席拉兹再浓等各党要。 曾敏凯:速办转换选民地址手续 另外,新邦波赖州议员曾敏凯则表示,邦咯岛州选区在短短一年内暴增5669张邮寄选票,与此同时务边国会选区预料将会飙升数千张空军邮寄选民,特别是登录在巫统藉议员的双溪喇叭州选区。   "这怀疑是有系统性和受到操控的铺排,所以民众必须时刻警惕身边的朋友,尽快办理新选民登记和转换投票地址程序,确保在大选可以投下促使国家改革的一票。"   他呼吁民众必须化悲愤为力量,立刻前往各邮政局或公正党服务柜台办理转换选民地址手续,特别是刚刚迁入翠林城的居民,因为该住宅区是正是属于务边国会选区。  

Tiada ulasan:

Catat Ulasan